iiNet Vs AFACT: The Verdict
As a lot of people are probably already aware iiNet was taken to court by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) for allegedly allowing its customers to illegally download copyrighted material (e.g. movies, music, etc).
This morning Justice Cowdroy has ruled in favour of iiNet stating that “I find that iiNet simply can’t be seen as approving infringement”. His verdict was that the “copyright (infringement) occured as result of use of BitTorrent, not the Internet” and that “iiNet has no control over (the) Bittorrent system and (is) not responsible for (the) Bittorrent system.”
Common sense and Australia’s Internet Freedom prevails, for now (see mandatory Australia Internet Censoring).


Mate,
Bad news today with the $1.6m fine handed to a 24 year old Brisbane guy who pirated Super Mario Bros Wii.
VERY expensive excercise!
I’m not sure how or if Nintendo really ever expect to get the money out of him though.…
Play safe!
$1.6m is a little excessive. It’s like the US lady Jammie Thomas-Rasset who was fined US$1.92 million for sharing 24 songs when the RIAA first originally took 30,000+ cases to court.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/whats-next-for-jammie-thomas-rasset.ars
Opps, forgot the link!
http://www.news.com.au/technology/james-burt-fined-16m-for-uploading-pirate-copy-of-super-mario-bros-wii/story-e6frfro0-1225828405307