<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TimWeb &#187; AFACT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tim.bellette.net/tag/afact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tim.bellette.net</link>
	<description>Tim Bellette on the Internets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iiNet Vs AFACT: The Verdict</title>
		<link>http://tim.bellette.net/2010/02/04/iinet-vs-afact-the-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://tim.bellette.net/2010/02/04/iinet-vs-afact-the-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bellette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bittorent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iiNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Cowdroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tim.bellette.net/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a lot of people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a lot of people are probably already aware iiNet was taken to court by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) for allegedly allowing its customers to illegally download copyrighted material (e.g. movies, music, etc).</p>
<p>This morning Justice Cowdroy has ruled in favour of iiNet stating that “I find that iiNet simply can’t be seen as approving infringement”. His verdict was that the “copyright (infringement) occured as result of use of BitTorrent, not the Internet” and that “iiNet has no control over (the) Bittorrent system and (is) not responsible for (the) Bittorrent system.”</p>
<p>Common sense and Australia’s Internet Freedom prevails, for now (see mandatory <a href="http://nocleanfeed.com/">Australia Internet Censoring</a>).</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tim.bellette.net/2010/02/04/iinet-vs-afact-the-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
